|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[Dysphagia] "The Forensic Aspects of Dysphagia"
- Subject: [Dysphagia] "The Forensic Aspects of Dysphagia"
- From: Drirenect at aol.com (Drirenect@aol.com)
- Date: Sun Feb 12 15:45:21 2006
I have read the article and plan to respond to it. I have never had the
slightest problem in explaining to the court (and having it accepted) that VFSS
is not the be all and end all and why (it often isn't available anyway), that
aspiration pneumonia from inhaled oropharyngeal contents is impossible to
diagnose accurately, that the patient is in more danger of developing it from
his/her own saliva about which nothing can be done except try to get good mouth
care and be able to testify that you did indeed check the patient's
dentition and oral hygiene to estimate the risk of infection from the aspirated
saliva. This is far more important in the process of attempting to protect the
patient. The other is trying to maintain or improve nutrition and hydration
status so that the patient has a chance of fighting off infection.. VFSS is
particularly unreliable when food is used since it it impossible to quantify the
results with respect to the published data on swallowing dynamics - all of
which have been done with barium alone.
There are certain things recommended by clinicians that are indefensible
e.g. thickened fluids since there is no evidence of usefulness and increasing
evidence of deleterious effects, PEG feedings when not required with resultant
aspiration pneumonitis, and so on but the issues around aspiration and its
putative causes is a monster created by the practitioners who now fear it.
Courts and juries are more impressed by expert research and valid, published
medical opinion than anything else.What should be feared is the possible
inability to assure the court that, as a clinician, you have all of the knowledge
and skills as outlined in the ASHA position paper as being required in this
field. In my experience, few possess them and some are unaware that they are
required to possess them. An expert witness must be board certified and that
represents a problem for SLPs since they are not so certified re dysphagia. It
also presents a problem for the lawyers since they have some difficulty finding
appropriately qualified experts.
We should all fear making mistakes - and everyone makes them. Making a
mistake is not a crime - but ignorance will create more problems any day.
|
|