|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[Dysphagia] Why Pureed Foods? [was "thickening breast milk"]
- Subject: [Dysphagia] Why Pureed Foods? [was "thickening breast milk"]
- From: SuzMorris at aol.com (SuzMorris@aol.com)
- Date: Sun Jul 11 12:05:06 2004
In a message dated 7/9/04 8:15:42 AM, eripley@yahoo.com writes:
> <<* I find this a very interesting issue. Coming as I do from a very
> different culture, in which, until relatively recently, babies were breast fed
> until ready to finger feed, I wonder at the conviction that babies must be given
> pureed foods at an age when they may not be able to accept them and they
> don't have the muscle skills needed to feed from a spoon. By far the majority of
> people in the world do not give babies prepared foods until the teeth erupt -
> usually when the molars erupt - and nature determines that they are ready to
> take finger foods. What have we been doing to entire generations of infants
> with this inexplicable practice? Actually, like many things, it's
> inexplicable until one applies the universal rule to an issue for which there doesn't
> seem to be an obvious answer - Who benefits? or, Follow the money.I know all
> about the added vitamin D etc. etc. but no-one has an answer to the questions
> a) are they needed and b) could they be causing problems later in lif!
> e? I suspect they are.
>
> Irene>>
>
>
In looking at feeding practices within a culture you have to go back to the
beliefs that essentially drive the current practices.? These become part of the
total cultural context that people eventually just take for granted as being
"true." Several major beliefs in this country have strongly influenced the
introduction and use of commercial pureed baby foods.
The first of these is related to the increase in bottle feeding and the decrea
se in breast feeding.? The bottle and infant formulas were promoted as a way
to give women greater freedom of choice of how to feed their baby, to make it
easier for mothers of infants to go back to work, and to provide a way of
feeding the baby that was built on a high-tech scientific, medical model.?? The
growth of technology was a driving force in the culture as a whole and the
rights of women were emerging.? Many women perceived that they would have greater
freedom if they were not tied down to nursing an infant every 3-4 hours for 12
months.? Employers were not willing to provide areas where nursing mothers
could express their milk on the job, so if a woman needed to work to help support
her family, breast feeding just wasn't an option.?? All of this addressed
another cultural belief/concern related to the sexualization of women's breasts
and beliefs that it was wrong and embarrassing to expose the breast in public,
even for feeding an infant.? This belief further restricted a woman's freedom
to nurse her baby when the baby needed to be fed, no matter where she was.?
Fewer new mothers had the ongoing support of their own mothers and grandmothers
for successful breast feeding.? With multiple generations of bottle-fed
infants, these older family members didn't have the experience of nursing their own
babies so that they could provide personal support for breast feeding to their
daughters.
As science and technology became a driving force for decision-making in
infant feeding one of the replicable results of research was that breast milk did
not supply an adequate amount of iron for the nursing infant after 4-6 months
of age.? The baby receives the iron needed for the first months of life from
the mother prior to birth. Prolonged exclusive breast feeding without the
introduction of iron-rich solids contributes to iron deficiency in older infants.?
This led to the development of iron-enriched baby cereals and the strong push
by pediatricians and baby food companies to introduce baby cereals between 4-6
months of age, especially if the infant was breast fed.
There is also some interesting data and speculation that bottle fed infants
may become more easily bored with formula diets.? These ideas are based on the
work of Julie Mennella and others at the Monell Chemical Senses Center that
show that the breast-fed infant is introduced to a wide array of flavors that
enter the breast milk from the mother's diet.? The formula-fed infant has a
monosensory diet.
Secondly,? our culture has placed a high value on early independence and
acceleration of infant development.? This has led to a whole series of
interrelated beliefs that drive parent feelings and actions.?? The strongest of these is
that babies need to learn to sleep through the night as early as possible and
that if they wake frequently, they must have higher caloric needs than can be
supplied by breast milk or formula.? The most common action that came from
this belief was the early introduction of baby cereal and other pureed foods.??
Many parents also see their baby's progression to pureed foods as a
developmental landmark.? Introducing the spoon and pureed food early allows some parents
to feel that their baby is accelerated in development.? This becomes a status
symbol for some mothers; for others, it promotes feelings of mothering
inadequacy if the baby isn't taking food from the spoon by 4-6 months.
The baby food industry saw a cultural need, and created a nitch for itself by
promoting the value of pureed food from a nutritional and developmental
perspective.? They have also created extensive advertising that furthers the
cultural belief that babies need pureed food as a transition food between? a
milk-based diet and chewable solid foods.? They also promote the ease and convenience
and the nutritional standardization of jarred foods for parents who are very
busy and looking for easier ways to parent their kids.? It is not at all
surprising with all of these factors that pureed foods are introduced early to
infants in this country.
One of the reasons we need to look at this situation as based in belief and
cultural systems is that change in these areas does not occur rapidly unless
there is a shift in the underlying belief that drives the behavior.? Look, for
example, at the abundance of research that says that breast feeding is best for
an infant, along with the recommendation of the American Academy of
Pediatrics (AAP) that all infants be breast fed until 12 months of age.?? There have
been slow increases in the number of mothers who choose initial breast feeding
for their baby, but the percentage of women who breast feed past 3 months of
age is still relatively small (39%).?? The AAP has been saying that supplemental
foods (i.e. purees) should be introduced between 4-6 months since the
mid-70s.? More recently they have supported the recommendation from the World Health
Organization that these foods not be introduced until 6 months.? The baby food
companies have slowly adopted the same guidelines in their advertisements.?
Yet, many parents introduce cereals in the bottle or by spoon at much younger
ages.? There is research data that shows that babies who receive pureed foods
don't have different sleep patterns than babies who receive an exclusive breast
milk or formula diet.? Yet many parents will tell you that they started
cereals early to help the baby sleep through the night.?? Scientific data by itself
just doesn't change behavior that is rooted in beliefs and cultural
traditions.
Irene's basic questions? [1. Are pureed foods needed? and 2. Could they be
causing problems later in life?] are very challenging to answer because, as I've
described, the answers are all tied in with beliefs and cultural traditions.?
There are so many underlying issues with the foods we eat as older children
and adults, that there is really no way to actually determine how much of our
later health problems are related to feeding practices during the first year of
life. For example, a series of recently published studies based on reported
dietary intake of 3,022 infants between the ages of 4 and 24 months [i.e.,
"FITS"/Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study] showed that nearly 25% of toddlers did
not eat any servings of vegetables and 33% did not eat any fruits. And of
those who ate vegetables, French fried potatoes were the most common vegetable
consumed between 15-24 months.? Earlier studies of young children's diets showed
that later eating patterns are strongly determined during the first year of
life. For example, the babies who were given a variety of fruits and vegetables
during the first year, were the same children who were eating an adequate
number of fruits and vegetables when they were 8 years old.? Babies whose diets
didn't include fruits and vegetables during the first year, were not consuming
these essential foods at 8 years.?
Unfortunately, even if it could be proven that solid foods are not needed
physiologically until the child has teeth and can chew and that early solid
feeding causes health issues, change would be very slow.? We can have an impact on
the individual families with whom we work, even while overall cultural
practices in our society change slowly.? Delaying the introduction of pureed foods
until a baby is 6 months old makes a lot of sense from the standpoint of
gastrointestinal and oral-motor skill development.?? There may be exceptions to this
[i.e. if a baby really needs to have formula or breast milk thickened as the
only alternative to tube feeding]; but as professionals we need to be
knowledgeable and strongly support the nutritional and health aspects of infant feeding
as we teach successful and safe eating and drinking skills.?? We need to
introduce the concept of dietary diversity as soon as pureed foods are introduced,
offering many opportunities for the child to experience a wide variety of
fruits, vegetables, grains and protein sources.?? Many feeding programs focus
solely on the quantity and texture of food eaten by the child (especially when
weaning from the tube) with very little initial attention to increasing the
number of different foods the child will accept (in small tastes).? Many
therapists build their feeding program around sweet and salty foods because children
prefer these tastes.? However, they often choose sweet puddings, candies,
cookies, etc., without remembering that many fruits and vegetables also offer sweet
tastes along with higher nutritional content.? Again, we must constantly
remind ourselves that our primary goal/purpose in being involved with feeding and
swallowing programs is to promote nutrition, hydration and full mealtime
interaction and inclusion. [This is also a belief, so we will find many
professionals who would set other priorities!]
Suzanne
Suzanne Evans Morris, Ph.D.
New Visions
1124 Roberts Mountain Rd.
Faber, VA 22938
(434) 361-2285 ext. 5
www.new-vis.com
|
|